top of page
loading.gif
Hon. James V. Selna
District judge
C.D.Cal.
9th Circuit
Average Rating:
6.1
 -
19
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. James V. Selna

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Civil Litigation - Private

25218

1/2/18

0

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

1

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

25092

1/2/17

9

6

9

10

10

10

0

8

0

0

1

0
0
0

9

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

20774

1/1/13

8

0

0

0

10

0

8

0

0

5

0

0
5
0

8.7

read comment
Litigant

18083

1/2/12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

12863

1/2/11

10

10

10

10

10

10

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

11657

1/1/10

8

8

8

8

9

7

0

6

0

0

0

0
0
0

8

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10168

1/1/10

1

1

1

1

3

1

0

2

0

0

1

0
0
0

1.3

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10119

1/3/10

10

8

8

7

8

3

0

8

0

0

4

0
0
0

7.3

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9709

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9626

1/1/09

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1
1
1

1

read comment
Other

6259

1/1/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5906

1/2/08

9

10

10

10

10

10

0

10

0

0

5

0
0
0

8.4

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5013

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

4588

1/2/07

8

8

8

8

8

8

0

7

0

0

3

0
0
0

8

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

4335

1/1/07

10

2

2

0

4

4

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

4.4

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Civil Litigation - Private

25218

1/2/18

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

25092

1/2/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

20774

1/1/13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Litigant

18083

1/2/12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

12863

1/2/11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

11657

1/1/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10168

1/1/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10119

1/3/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9709

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9626

1/1/09

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Other

6259

1/1/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5906

1/2/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5013

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

4588

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

4335

1/1/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
Other

12611

1/1/11
9
read comment
Other

10012

1/2/10
1
read comment
Other

8607

1/1/09
1
read comment
Other

4554

1/1/07
3
read comment
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. James V. Selna

minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
25218
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Had no interest in applying the law correctly or hearing contrary arguments once his mind was made up. He saw an easy opportunity to lighten his docket and took it. Lazy, intellectually dishonest, and does not follow the law.
1/2/18, 3:54 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
25092
rating:
9
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
We were a little surprised that a former biglaw partner and Bush appointee would be so even-handed in our plaintiff-side case. He seemed to simply apply the precedent as written, and is very knowledgeable about how trials are to be conducted.
1/2/17, 10:49 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
20774
rating:
8.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Selna was very fair with my client. He's certainly not pro-defense, but I didn't find him to be pro-government either. He was... well, judicious. Go figure! He actually read and considered my sentencing memorandum, the sentence was quite fair and well-reasoned. He was professional and his judicial temperament was just fine. No complaints.
1/1/13, 11:26 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
18083
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
On Ocober 2, 2006 had more than a year's worth of calendar work listed. I believe this was a sanction for dismissing civil complaints.
1/2/12, 4:56 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
12863
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
I found Judge Selna to be quite pleasant in his demeanor, industrious, timely in the issuance of tentative rulings well in advance of the hearings and always very clear and correct in his rulings. A very fine judge and a pleasure to be in his courtroom!
1/2/11, 3:29 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
12611
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Really nice person and an excellent judge. Doesn't seem to have the 'God complex.'
1/1/11, 8:32 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
11657
rating:
8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A fine judge. Hardly in the pocket of big business. Often gets it right, in terms of appellate review, compared to other judges.
1/1/10, 11:52 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
10168
rating:
1.3
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
James V. Selna should not be a presiding judge in a game of 'duck duck goose'. That is of course unless one of the players has deep pockets.
1/1/10, 9:19 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
10119
rating:
7.3
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Runs his court and conducts himself in a way that appears fair in decisions leading up to trial. However, flip flops on his own decisions and biased on the side of 'Big Business' in decisions where it really counts.
1/3/10, 2:17 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
10012
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Small minded judge; hates to make decisions; does not follow the law
1/2/10, 1:24 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
9709
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/10, 10:01 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
9626
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
this kind of person should never even be let near a bench - always sides with whatever side has more money - be it bank or large corporation and he has no compassion whatsoever
1/1/09, 8:48 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
8607
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Selna's recent ruling against free speech using the Lemon Test is unbelievably stupid. He claims he cannot find a 'secular purpose' in the declaration that creationism is 'superstitious nonsense.' Then he's a complete nitwit! The state has a more than compelling secular interest in standing against pseudoscience!
1/1/09, 9:13 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
6259
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
When he threw out the case that Shell Oil Company dealers had against Shell Oil, he pretty much jumped in bed with Big Oil, and showed he is more focused on his future in a political arena owned by big money interests. Shell dealers have been run out of business, and many ruined financially, by their parent oil company, and he is helping by throwing the case out. He should be ashamed. Just my opinion.
1/1/08, 3:00 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
5906
rating:
8.4
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Selna is hard-working, smart, and seemed very fair in the consumer-related cases I brought before him. He didn't give me everything I wanted, but he diligently strived to reach the legally correct and fair result. In pre-trial matters, he often appears stern and formal, but he becomes slightly more casual with the parties when they are in trial with him.
1/2/08, 2:08 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
5013
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Selna is intelligent, industrious, and not, as some believe, pro-government or small-minded. Actually, he is very reserved, polite, and almost always gets it right. He was a real lawyer, and he's a real judge. He is accommodating to lawyers while capable of being firm when that's necessary. His apparently humorless demeanor belies a wry sense of humor. He's quite a nice man.
1/2/07, 1:29 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
4588
rating:
8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/07, 10:48 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
4554
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Rubber stamp for the government. Has myopic vision of what a federal judge should be and how one should respond to public pressure. Small-minded, to put it nicely.
1/1/07, 9:33 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
4335
rating:
4.4
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Bush appointee. Friendly, not particularly scholarly. Appears not to fully grasp issues and favors government defendants.
1/1/07, 2:32 PM
Send email to poster

© 2019 by The Robing Room

bottom of page