top of page
loading.gif
Hon. Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.
District judge
S.D.Ohio
6th Circuit
Average Rating:
5.9
 -
8
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Civil Litigation - Private

32905

12/18/21

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

21285

1/2/13

9

8

8

10

9

10

0

0

0

0

3

0
0
0

9

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

6402

1/2/08

10

10

10

9

10

10

8

9

10

10

10

10
10
10

9.6

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

6194

1/2/08

3

3

2

2

2

3

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

2.5

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3576

1/2/07

10

7

9

9

0

9

0

10

0

0

10

0
0
0

8.8

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2144

1/1/06

5

2

2

2

4

3

0

7

0

0

10

0
0
0

3

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1819

1/2/06

5

1

10

6

10

0

2

0

0

9

0

9
9
0

5.7

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1484

1/2/06

10

8

5

8

10

10

10

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

8.7

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Civil Litigation - Private

32905

12/18/21

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

21285

1/2/13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

6402

1/2/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

6194

1/2/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3576

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2144

1/1/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1819

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1484

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Edmund A. Sargus, Jr.

minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
32905
rating:
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Sargus allows people to abuse drugs in Ohio and then threaten to rape and murder a disabled person. Thats all you need to know about him.
12/18/21, 1:21 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
21285
rating:
9
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This judge is very practical and very fair. He has an excellent rapport with juries. He will let you try your case.
1/2/13, 2:09 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
6402
rating:
9.6
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This judge is humble, but very capable. If an attorney takes the time and energy to explain a point with merit, he will listen and be persuaded. He does not suffer lawyers whose egos are bigger than their brains.
1/2/08, 8:33 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
6194
rating:
2.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A complex case before him is a train wreck waiting to happen. He is not nearly as smart as he thinks he is and, once he has decided something, he stops listening.
1/2/08, 1:34 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
3576
rating:
8.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
We had a TRO motion before him and he did a Herculean job in getting the sides together to resolve their differences without the need to rule on the motion. Very creative with respect to his participation in the negotiations. Candidly, one of the best judges that I've encountered in a long time.
1/2/07, 11:07 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
2144
rating:
3
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A nice man, though prone to small fits of impatience, not the shaprest knife in the drawer
1/1/06, 4:24 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
1819
rating:
5.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Actually gave advice to the AUSA at sidebar during trial as to how to get out of the witness the information that my successful objections were blocking. I objected to the instructions and he just rolled on with them. Found ways around Crawford that are baffling and unsupportable. Seemed a doomed case from the start and ended that way.
1/2/06, 7:05 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
1484
rating:
8.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Very fair.
1/2/06, 11:51 AM
Send email to poster

© 2019 by The Robing Room

bottom of page