top of page
loading.gif
Hon. Joan M. Azrack
District judge
E.D.N.Y.
2nd Circuit
Average Rating:
8.2
 -
24
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Joan M. Azrack

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Civil Litigation - Private

24711

1/2/17

3

1

1

0

0

1

0

10

0

0

3

0
0
0

1.5

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

24044

1/1/16

3

1

5

0

0

1

0

0

0

0

5

0
0
0

2.5

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

22941

1/2/15

9

9

0

0

9

0

5

9

6

5

0

0
4
0

8

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

22719

1/1/15

5

4

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

5

0
0
0

3.7

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

18698

1/1/12

10

10

10

10

10

10

0

10

0

0

10

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

18029

1/2/12

10

9

10

10

10

10

0

10

0

0

10

0
0
0

9.8

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

13192

1/2/11

10

8

10

10

10

0

10

10

0

5

0

0
0
0

9.7

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

12913

1/2/11

10

9

10

10

9

0

10

9

0

0

10

0
0
0

9.7

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

12265

1/1/11

10

8

10

10

10

10

10

10

7

5

10

0
0
0

9.7

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10518

1/2/10

9

9

10

0

10

9

0

0

0

0

10

0
0
0

9.4

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9500

1/2/09

10

8

10

10

9

10

10

10

9

10

10

0
0
0

9.6

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

8373

1/2/09

10

8

10

8

8

10

0

8

0

0

9

0
0
0

9

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

6710

1/2/08

10

10

9

9

9

10

0

8

0

0

7

0
0
0

9.5

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

4855

1/2/07

10

9

10

10

9

0

10

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

9.7

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

3056

1/2/06

8

0

0

0

8

8

0

8

0

0

0

0
0
0

8

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

3069

1/2/06

10

10

10

10

10

10

0

10

0

0

10

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2883

1/1/06

10

10

10

10

10

10

0

10

0

0

0

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2731

1/2/06

10

10

10

9

9

9

0

9

0

0

10

0
0
0

9.5

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2283

1/2/06

10

8

7

8

8

8

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

8.2

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1276

1/2/06

8

8

8

8

8

8

0

8

0

0

0

0
0
0

8

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Civil Litigation - Private

24711

1/2/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

24044

1/1/16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

22941

1/2/15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

22719

1/1/15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

18698

1/1/12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

18029

1/2/12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

13192

1/2/11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

12913

1/2/11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

12265

1/1/11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10518

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9500

1/2/09

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

8373

1/2/09

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

6710

1/2/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

4855

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

3056

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

3069

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2883

1/1/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2731

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2283

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1276

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
Other

30671

1/2/19
10
read comment
Litigant

23448

1/2/16
9
read comment
Other

2159

1/1/06
9
read comment
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Joan M. Azrack

minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
30671
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Joan Azrack is a fair compassionate judge who is excellent in what she does. She Lao ha a heart nd ver understanding, kudos to her.
1/2/19, 4:58 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
24711
rating:
1.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Puzzled by the high ratings. Biggest criticism is just that she is weak, and seemingly gullible. Seems to regard certain cases as an inconvenience, and tries to force parties to settle instead of doing her job. Had a very simple case in front of her that we ultimately won, but it dragged out a needlessly long time due to her indecision, gullibility, reluctance to bring down the hammer, and lack of industriousness in deciding motions. Very disappointing experience. Did not feel like I was litigating in a federal court.
1/2/17, 7:56 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
24044
rating:
2.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This Judge does not believe any police officer ever did anything wrong-no matter what she is shown. If you have a civil rights case, avoid her like the plague
1/1/16, 7:37 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
23448
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Non-lawyer here. Permit me to comment. I ended up on the wrong side of a lawsuit. This was an intimidating experience, although I felt not responsible. This judge was intelligent, understanding, and very competent. She didn't miss anything and is inspirational. We won our case, but I hope not to visit court again.
1/2/16, 8:55 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
22941
rating:
8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Recently had a white-collar telemarketing fraud sentencing in front of her, where the client entered a plea to 37-46 range. She had read the papers and gave us as much time as we needed. She is new to district court having been elevated from her long-time USMJ duties. She has been honed well during her many years as a MJ and unqualifiedly appears ready and fit for battle. In the end, she gave a one-third reduction from the minimum guideline range based upon a host of extraordinary 3553(a) circumstances besetting my 69-year old client. She Understood the law and her sentencing powers. Not afraid to exercise her Article III powers, despite being relatively new to the DJ bench. Gave a similar -- but greater -- variance to a co-defendant sentenced later in the day. It's so refreshing to appear before a court that understands that the government's unbridled quest for justice (retribution) must be tempered with compassion, humanity and common sense.
1/2/15, 4:56 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
22719
rating:
3.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Why this Judge would insist on calling a plaintiff client against the wishes of his counsel to urge a settlement is inappropriate and in my opinion inexcusable. Particularly when the Magistrate was wrong on the law. Years of effort down the drain.
1/1/15, 10:35 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
18698
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
She's awesome. Picked a jury in fornt of her in minutes. What a pleasure. Funny, smart, friendly.
1/1/12, 9:31 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
18029
rating:
9.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Azrack is a very fine judge. She is courteous, knowledgeable and even handed. She is willing to devote considerable time to resolve cases and achieve a just result.
1/2/12, 5:12 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
13192
rating:
9.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Azrack is a terrific magistrate judge who should have had the word magistrate removed from her title years ago by being appointed to the district court. She is smart, fair, courteous and invariably gets it right. We could use more like her on the bench.
1/2/11, 5:54 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
12913
rating:
9.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A very fine judge. Courteous, smart and tries to reach the right result within the law.
1/2/11, 12:15 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
12265
rating:
9.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A star, to be sure...defines what a federal judge should be...fair, sharp, evenhanded, open minded, rational, great temperament, wise beyond her mantle! Time for her to move to the district court!!
1/1/11, 8:39 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
10518
rating:
9.4
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Very good judge.
1/2/10, 4:53 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
9500
rating:
9.6
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Azrack is smart & balanced. She is considerate of the litigants and parties. She is focused and has a unique ability to see the big picture and help find solutions. She is practical and effective. A star!
1/2/09, 12:28 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
8373
rating:
9
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/09, 1:32 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
6710
rating:
9.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
I concur wholeheartedly with the comments below. Easily the most pleasant MJ to deal with in the ED. Courteous, pleasant, prepared and even-handed.
1/2/08, 2:31 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
4855
rating:
9.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
She is superb. Cannot understand why she has not been moved to District Court. Smart, practical, no-nonsense but also a warm, funny human being.
1/2/07, 6:03 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
3056
rating:
8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A lovely human being. It is always a pleasure to appear before her.
1/2/06, 5:26 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
3069
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
She's aces. Great personality, down to earth, easy to talk to.
1/2/06, 11:51 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
2883
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
My pick for the best Judge in the Eastern District. She's tough as nails when it comes down to it (and I've been on the wrong side on several occasions).
1/1/06, 1:24 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
2731
rating:
9.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A fair-minded and compassionate MJ who works hard. One of the best.
1/2/06, 3:07 AM
Send email to poster

© 2019 by The Robing Room

bottom of page