top of page
Hon. Josephine L. Staton
District judge
C.D.Cal.
9th Circuit
Average Rating:
0
 -
0
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

arrow&v

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Josephine L. Staton

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Court Staff

32733

7/28/19

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

10

10

1

10
1
10

1

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

32734

7/28/19

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Court Staff

32707

11/11/19

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

10

10

1

10
1
10

1

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

32707

11/11/19

0

1

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

1

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Court Staff

32733

7/28/19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

32734

7/28/19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Court Staff

32707

11/11/19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

32707

11/11/19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
Other

32735

7/28/19
1
read comment
Other

32707

11/11/19
1
read comment
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Josephine L. Staton

minitalk.gif
Court Staff
comment #:
32733
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Stanton time and time again does not agree with, and indeed tramples the US Constitution, thereby putting the future of the country and its citizens at risk. Instead of agreeing with our Founding Fathers, Judge Stanton allows her personal fears and political beliefs to guide her judicial decisions, thereby undermining the very fabric of our great country and everything that every single one of our brave soldiers have fought and died for.
7/28/19, 12:21 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
32734
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
The misogynist definition of assault that just includes plastic ergonomic parts that make a rifle safer to use is bad enough but your parroting lies about rate of fire is disconcerting. It would make educated people think that you are paid off by tyrants or ignorant of the things you are making judgements on. I thought the constitution and law was supposed to be upheld? Shall not be infringed? Sounds kinda like infringed.
7/28/19, 3:51 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
32735
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Nothing more than an activist judge who subverts the US constitution.
7/28/19, 5:39 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Court Staff
comment #:
32707
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Stanton time and time again does not agree with, and indeed tramples the US Constitution, thereby putting the future of the country and its citizens at risk. Instead of agreeing with our Founding Fathers, Judge Stanton allows her personal fears and political beliefs to guide her judicial decisions, thereby undermining the very fabric of our great country and everything that every single one of our brave soldiers have fought and died for.
11/11/19, 5:22 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
32707
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
The misogynist definition of assault that just includes plastic ergonomic parts that make a rifle safer to use is bad enough but your parroting lies about rate of fire is disconcerting. It would make educated people think that you are paid off by tyrants or ignorant of the things you are making judgements on. I thought the constitution and law was supposed to be upheld? Shall not be infringed? Sounds kinda like infringed.
11/11/19, 5:22 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
32707
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Nothing more than an activist judge who subverts the US constitution.
11/11/19, 5:22 AM
Send email to poster
bottom of page