top of page
Hon. Stephanie A. Gallagher
Magistrate judge
D.Md.
4th Circuit
Average Rating:
4
 -
3
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Stephanie A. Gallagher

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Litigant

33010

2/18/24

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

33002

11/30/23

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1
1
1

1

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24791

1/1/17

1

1

1

1

0

1

1

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

1

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24502

1/2/17

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

5

5

7

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

24089

1/2/17

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0
0
0

1

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Litigant

33010

2/18/24

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

33002

11/30/23

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24791

1/1/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24502

1/2/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

24089

1/2/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
Litigant

33015

4/10/24
1
read comment
Litigant

33003

1/14/24
1
read comment
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Stephanie A. Gallagher

minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
33015
rating:
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Stephanie Agli Gallagher’s ruling in the Morgan State University case, where Dr. Dina El Mahdy was the plaintiff, was full of judicial errors, including messing up the timeline of events. This salient error ignores a clear proximity between Dr. El Mahdy’s complaint of racism from her chair, Dr. Sharon Finney, and her second complaint of sexual harassment against Dr. Solomon Alao, who wanted to sexually exploit Dr. El Mahdy using the accreditation and AACSB as a tool. The judge ignored all affidavits from Dr. El mahdy’s witnesses and allows perjury by Morgan State University actors. The ruling was also racist in tone because of Dr. El Mahdy’s religion and country of origin. Judge Gallagher frequently sides with the most powerful party in terms of governmental influence. Baltimore is so corrupt on so many levels, including the federal court. I agree with the comments on this page that go back to 2017 and warn the public that judge Gallagher should not be on the bench due to her racism towards victims. No wonder that this judge was nominated by both Obama and then Trump. This shows the huge controversies around her hiring but clearly corruption won her on the bench.
4/10/24, 11:36 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
33010
rating:
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
I can only wait for karma to come back and haunt Judge Stephanie Agli Gallagher who psychologically tortured me in the Maryland District Court, but this isn't the reason we have judges and courts. Rating is ZERO.
2/18/24, 9:03 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
33003
rating:
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Stephanie Agli Gallagher is simply a corrupt person. There is no other word that can describe this person. She should not be a lifetime judge. All her rulings must be revisited for intentional violations of state and federal laws. She sides with the richest, and most powerful. She not only was unfair to me in my civil litigation but was a bully and slandered me in federal court because I am a Muslim scholar. I pray for justice one day and will never forget what Gallagher has caused to me and my family. Her ruling in denying inmates minimum wage was brutal, inhumane, and unfair. Her opinion in this matter and the tone of the ruling was more like a bully towards a poor victim. Why there is no authority over her?
1/14/24, 6:32 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Govt.
comment #:
33002
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
I concur with the comments from 2017. This judge is racist, discriminates against minority individuals but stands with big institutions regardless of their race. She would not have treated me with disgrace and injustice if I was white born Christian, or Jewish in the USA. Her judicial bias caused a life trauma to me, my Muslim family, and my friends inside and outside the USA.
11/30/23, 3:07 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
24791
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
She is full of herself. Doesn't belong on the bench. Overrated. Arrogant. Disrespectful to minorities. Has no business being. Baltimore city federal court jurist. Sloppy vetting when she was considered by the prior administration for a federal judgeship. Former law clerk to Mottz. Mistake, mistake, mistake. All the negative comments you read about Mortz will apply to her. She is a Motz protege. She probably got others to artificially give her high ratings on this page.
1/1/17, 11:48 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
24502
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Gallagher has been an outstanding addition to the bench in this District. Contrary to the outrageous comments by one poster suggesting otherwise, Judge Gallagher is patient, considerate, and polite to all parties that appear before her. She has the judicial temperament that lawyers and parties would hope to see in a federal magistrate judge.
1/2/17, 1:09 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Govt.
comment #:
24089
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This woman is horrible and a racist. Lacks basic human principles and is a complete bully. Why did President Obama appoint her. I'm writing to the Senate and President about this judge.
1/2/17, 3:31 AM
Send email to poster
bottom of page