THE ROBING ROOM

In employment cases . . . ZEEEE WORST!!! Applies the rules of evidence one way for employers, and the opposite way for plaintiffs--in the same opinion. Ignores evidence, as though it's not in the record, that could undermine the employer's defense. Then, just to raise the bar even higher, puts the burden on the plaintiff to DISPROVE that an employer's witnesses have an adequate evidentiary foundation. This guy was a federal prosecutor. You'd assume he knows the rules of evidence. But his rulings make you wonder if he's campaigning for the next open USDC seat in a Republican administration. Or he just thinks plaintiffs are leaches.