top of page
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
average rating is 2.2 out of 5
average rating is null out of 5
Judge Jackson often makes up his mind long before ANY discovery has taken place based on God only knows what criteria, makes many largely unsupported conclusory statements that are prejudicial to one side, even interrupting counsel he disagrees with to prevent counsel from completing a thought/argument, and generally acts curmudgeonly in his court. He probably should have retired long ago, and his personal conduct in the courtroom is, in my opinion, prejudicial to the administration of justice, but he does not seem to care, of course.
7/15/19, 2:16 AM
Hon. R. Brooke Jackson

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

bottom of page