top of page
comment #:
average rating is null out of 5
average rating is null out of 5
I have had this judge twice in Qui Tam litigation. First time he felony concealed my original service 02CA0237DB and the docket proves entry 137 at the front of the docket rather than the back. When the government intervened, the second time he got a stay and dismissed the case with prejudice, knowing that the first case was a private right of action and the second was US Plaintiff and not res judicata on 04CV0452.
7/15/19, 2:11 AM
Hon. David Briones

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

bottom of page