top of page
![loading.gif](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a50021_9cd5563a891547a7ae830bdc816bc3c2~mv2.gif)
THE ROBING ROOM
where judges are judged
![minitalk.gif](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a50021_c2c724f667fb44a18c2cc532984c2c36~mv2.gif)
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
1628
rating:
0
Had a bail revocation proceeding before Judge Spatt July 2006 where the client -- an attorney -- violated conditions of post-sentencing bail by travelling to Canada for a cruise to Alaska (with parents), in violation of a condition of bail restricting travel to the continental U.S. The government learned of the violation from Homeland Security, obtained an ex parte warrant and arrested client in Alaska. Client spent 4-5 days in custody before returning to the U.S. The government wanted the client to be held in contempt, with bail revoked and $150,000 bail forfeited. Judge Spatt, to his credit, permitted the client to return home from Alaska with no escort, declined to find a contempt, and fined the client $30,000 rather than forfeit the $150,000. He handled a difficult case realistically on short notice and did not simply yield to the government's over-the-top requests.
7/15/19, 2:10 AM
Hon. Arthur D. Spatt
Send reply to the comment poster:
note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email
HOME
bottom of page