top of page
![loading.gif](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a50021_9cd5563a891547a7ae830bdc816bc3c2~mv2.gif)
THE ROBING ROOM
where judges are judged
![minitalk.gif](https://static.wixstatic.com/media/a50021_c2c724f667fb44a18c2cc532984c2c36~mv2.gif)
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
10534
rating:
2.3
This judge is terrible, and I shudder when I see that he has been assigned to a case I file. Even though he gives parties time to present argument, he makes up his mind quickly (if he hasn''t made it up before you open your mouth). He allows his prejudices to color the litigation, but puts on a good appearance of evenhandedness by appearing to be emotionally detatched. He does not follow the law when he knows he can get away with it. (e.g., when he knows the your client does not have the resources to pay for an appellate challenge). I would ordinarily give him a higher rating for scholarship, because it is clear he is smart, but he does not care about scholarship if he wants to get rid of your case. In other words, he is a sneak. I have also heard that when he was a public defender in Chester County, he was essentially a lap dog for the district attorney''s office. Overall awful.
7/15/19, 2:12 AM
Hon. Juan R. Sanchez
Send reply to the comment poster:
note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email
HOME
bottom of page