top of page
loading.gif
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
29733
rating:
7
average rating is 5 out of 5
average rating is 2 out of 5
Civil rights case against USA/Bivens Action. Started out on a very sour note when Judge Bernal dismissed the action- Ex Parte without notice or argument- on an alleged technicality. After getting the action reinstated Judge Bernal bent over backwards to give the Feds every opportunity possible. After the Feds/AUSA fumbled the ball on every down Judge Bernal saw the light (he had no other choice really) and knew there was only one way this game could end; Judge Bernal did what he was supposed to do as a 'referee' and made the right ruling, which was the ONLY legit ruling he could make based on the facts of the case. Like Chief Justice John Roberts said at his confirmation hearing, judges are just there to 'call balls and strikes' and ensure a fair playing field (OK, try not to laugh at that). In this action Judge Bernal was a very fair referee/umpire. Took some pushing and convincing to get him there, but he was fair today. 7/10 today, and I hope to raise Judge Bernal's average in future actions before him.
7/15/19, 2:16 AM
Hon. Jesus G. Bernal

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

SUBMIT

© 2019 by The Robing Room

bottom of page