top of page
Criminal Defense Lawyer
In the case of Berg v. Obama, the judge ruled on the standing case law. One would expect him to raise the issue of the common sense of the law. As in Roe v. Wade, there comes a time when a judge needs to consider the good of the people. As in this case, the judge should have admonished the DNC and Senator Obama for not providing good faith discovery of the information. Why drag on this lawsuit? What is behind the litigation here? Why not come forward with the basics? Rather, the judge admonished Mr. Berg for speaking on behalf of the people.
7/15/19, 2:11 AM
Hon. R. Barclay Surrick
Send reply to the comment poster:
note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email
bottom of page