top of page
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
8761
rating:
4.4
average rating is 4.4 out of 5
average rating is null out of 5
Judge Titus had not read any of the exhibits, contradicted himself and the record on key facts. It was obvious the clerk had prewritten something for him. Did not bother to cite an actual example of hearsay, but claimed he was not using whatever 'it' (the hearsay) was for his opinion. Ignores motions, just doesn't answer. His office loses documents regularly. He should not be able to sleep at night after this type of innattention. Pooh pooh'd that he is a victim of the 4th circuit (because George Bush appointed him). Law is nuanced and he has none of that capability.
7/15/19, 2:12 AM
Hon. Roger W. Titus

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

SUBMIT
bottom of page