THE ROBING ROOM

It seems that he likes the banks and hates pro se litigants. He is friendly with the defendants' counsel. Our family wanted to believe that justice would prevail, so even though we could not afford a team of fraud attorneys, we filed suit so that our time would not run out. Retainers were financially impossible for us, unless we had decided to become homeless. Throughout the four years of our case, Judge Norgle turned a consumer protection statute into a weapon for predatory lenders and loan servicers, and even allowed continuing blatant violations against us, and the defendants' obvious lies, to permeate the proceedings. We were forced into bankruptcy on top of it all. He had the power to save us and our children and failed to do so. I feel that we were subjected to a hostile and biased court, and that many of his orders were plainly wrong and unfair. His rulings in our case have already been cited by the predators and will damage many families in the future, no doubt.