top of page
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
11462
rating:
2.5
average rating is 2.5 out of 5
average rating is null out of 5
Eratic, testy, petty, and often unprepared. Demonstrates a meticulous unfamiliarity with the briefs. Hearings are predictable. He let the first person speak, then react emotionally to something, and the hearing is devoted to his uninformed, and very transient, new interest. His written rulings seem thoughtful, but either they are intellectually dishonest, or he gives his clerks too much freedom to conform the opinion to his desired outcome. You can't say he's pro- or -anti anything in his rulings. He's erratic. He is not stupid. He's intellectually lazy regarding the cases before him.
7/15/19, 2:12 AM
Hon. William Alsup

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

SUBMIT
bottom of page