top of page
comment #:
average rating is null out of 5
average rating is null out of 5
These recent 10 point rating reviews of Snow are highly dubious. When somebody comments 'The negative comments here are mainly left by those who do not agree with his ruling in the Arpaio case' one must wonder what agenda the commentor has. Why is this person even talking about the years old Arpaio case and attempting to assume the other comments are related to it? How come the person isn't talking specifics about why Snow was so great for the case the commentor is representing? Snow is notorious for being one of the worst judges in Arizona. He does not follow the law and his distemper and utter incompetence has inflicted harm upon many innocent people. He is the product of a broken system and is not fair or just. Anyone who digs into the orders he issues (and the filings behind them) will quickly find he rarely justifies his actions and does whatever he wants (and interprets laws in a fashion that benefit whatever agenda he has and what sort of mood he is in). Arpaio is different. Snow had to make sure it was done 'as proper as possible' because of the public spotlight. But with the smaller cases where average Americans are seeking justice or protection (that aren't in the spotlight) he completely fails. If you get Snow, be very wary. You're in big trouble.
7/15/19, 2:16 AM
Hon. G. Murray Snow

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

bottom of page