top of page
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
21276
rating:
0
average rating is null out of 5
average rating is null out of 5
Federal Magistrate Judge Corley allowed the appointed Federal Attorney to base his entire 25+ year-old loan case and proceed with an incomplete and demonstratively highly questionable unauthenticated business record (normally not allowed in court as being the sole foundational evidence). Despite the fact that the defendant (who proceeded pro se for financial reasons) produced a Federal Inspector General's audit report which reflected numerous instances of blatant loan fraud (which any reasonable jury would have found compelling), Judge Corley directed the defendant to a reduced financial settlement. When you have a significantly documented defense, but cannot afford a trial, you are basically forced to settle. This judge had the plaintiff's attorney's motion held over our head in abeyance (like a thug would twist your arm until you cried 'uncle'). Frankly speaking, the bottom line is, Judge Corley aided and abetted the opposition in order to bring their initially perpetrated fraud to its final fruition. 'Oh wad power the giftee gee us, to see ourselves as others see us.'
7/15/19, 2:13 AM
Hon. Jacqueline S. Corley

Send reply to the comment poster:

note: comment poster will be able to reply directly to your email

SUBMIT
bottom of page