top of page
Hon. James L. Robart
District judge
W.D.Wash.
9th Circuit
Average Rating:
6.3
 -
5
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. James L. Robart

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24158

1/1/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Litigant

24170

1/1/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

20827

1/2/13

9

9

9

10

9

10

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

9.3

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

13403

1/2/12

4

7

6

3

3

2

0

0

0

0

4

0
0
0

4.2

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5967

1/2/08

3

4

7

8

9

2

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

5.5

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24158

1/1/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Litigant

24170

1/1/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

20827

1/2/13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

13403

1/2/12

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5967

1/2/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. James L. Robart

minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
24158
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
The Security of Our Nation shouldn't be political. The orders of the President should be respected. People who would put others in jeopardy for political points with foreigners should be held accountable when and if something bad happens to an American Citizen by the foreigners who are of course, not covered by the Constitution of the United States.
1/1/17, 7:50 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
24170
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
The Liberal left pushing their Political Agendas and Personal Views from Bench is a disgrace to our Country and our Constitution. This is not the reason for their Federal Judiciary. Nobody is above the law in Federal Judges, nor were they Appointed to supplement Our United States Constitution for their own personal opinions and Political Aspirations and Lobbyists pressures. The Senate must review these Federal Judges, Entire Court for Impeachment and Removal of due to Abuse of Power, Manifestation of Injustice and Litigating from the Bench. Their actions are clearly to appease their own personal agendas and the Elite, endanger us all and are clearly Contrary to law. They simply do not care the impact.
1/1/17, 3:33 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Govt.
comment #:
20827
rating:
9.3
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
An outstanding trial and motions judge. He is thoroughly prepared, often using outlines or prepared notes. Intellectually curious, politically astute, and an excellent reader of character and motives. Just the judge that you want if you need one who is really smart. Don't ever try to pull the wool over his eyes.
1/2/13, 2:34 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
13403
rating:
4.2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Knowing his prior law firm, and you will likely know who he favors.
1/2/12, 3:51 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
5967
rating:
5.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Temperament has not yet left private practice in service of his clients. Wears his crown too heavily.
1/2/08, 12:23 PM
Send email to poster
bottom of page