top of page
Hon. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.
District judge
N.D.W.Va.
4th Circuit
Average Rating:
5.4
 -
5
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

arrow&v

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Criminal Defense Lawyer

32664

1/2/19

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

1

0
0
0

1

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

8462

1/2/09

10

6

5

4

7

1

1

7

10

10

2

10
9
1

4.9

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

7472

1/2/08

9

8

9

9

9

0

2

6

0

9

0

7
8
1

7.7

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

4311

1/2/07

10

7

7

7

10

7

0

8

0

0

0

0
0
0

8

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Criminal Defense Lawyer

32664

1/2/19

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

8462

1/2/09

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

7472

1/2/08

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

4311

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
Other

2752

1/2/06
10
read comment
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.

minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
32664
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A terrible judge. Some people are appointed to the bench and are just bad appointments. No skill in Title VII matters. Discretionary calls over a simple issue as removal were way off. This judge was part of a wicked plot to undermine the system along with Judge Catherine Blake. Both were co-conspirators. Stamp agreed to have a case specially assigned to him only and to rule against a party in a certain way. They both should have been punished for their back room deals and underhanded behavior. Neither deserve to be federal judges.
1/2/19, 4:01 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
8462
rating:
4.9
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
​
1/2/09, 7:32 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
7472
rating:
7.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A pawn of the probation office.
1/2/08, 4:53 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
4311
rating:
8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A potential leaning toward the civil defendant, but nothing extraordinary or even pronounced. Overall fair. Courteous and pleasant to work with. A true gentleman.
1/2/07, 8:11 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
2752
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Dedicated judge with excellent courtroom presence and thoughtful deliberation.
1/2/06, 11:28 AM
Send email to poster
bottom of page