
THE ROBING ROOM
where judges are judged
Hon. Marcia S. Krieger
District judge
D.Colo.
10th Circuit
Average Rating:
3.2
-
42
rating(s)
rating submitted
Please send me alerts on this judge
subscribed
Ratings:
What others have rated
Hon. Marcia S. Krieger
evaluator
ID
date
Temp* Sch* Indu* Comp* Punct* Ev-Cv* Ev-Cr* Flex Bail Crim Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Criminal Defense Lawyer
32647
1/1/19
10
10
10
10
10
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.4
Criminal Defense Lawyer
32652
1/1/19
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
Civil Litigation - Private
27331
1/2/18
1
2
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.2
Civil Litigation - Private
23390
1/1/16
2
1
1
2
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.5
Criminal Defense Lawyer
23391
1/1/16
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Court Staff
22021
1/2/14
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
10
10
1
1
1
1
1
Civil Litigation - Private
19364
1/2/13
3
3
1
1
1
7
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.3
Civil Litigation - Private
18665
1/2/12
2
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.8
Litigant
12759
1/2/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
11642
1/2/10
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
Criminal Defense Lawyer
11498
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
11261
1/2/10
1
1
3
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.5
Civil Litigation - Private
10241
1/1/10
4
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1.6
Civil Litigation - Private
10160
1/1/10
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Civil Litigation - Private
9560
1/1/09
2
1
1
2
6
1
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.2
Civil Litigation - Private
9373
1/2/09
3
3
3
2
5
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2.8
Civil Litigation - Private
9388
1/2/09
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Civil Litigation - Private
9128
1/2/09
1
3
0
3
7
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.8
Criminal Defense Lawyer
9173
1/1/09
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Criminal Defense Lawyer
8575
1/2/09
5
4
0
1
5
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.8
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly ProGovernment,10=Strongly ProDefense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly ProPlaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly ProEmployee,10=Strongly ProEmployer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly ProImmigrant,10=Strongly ProGov.)
evaluator
ID
date
Fam Par Qu-Arg At-Arg Sch Cri Civ Lab Imm
Criminal Defense Lawyer
32647
1/1/19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
32652
1/1/19
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
27331
1/2/18
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
23390
1/1/16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
23391
1/1/16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Court Staff
22021
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
19364
1/2/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
18665
1/2/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Litigant
12759
1/2/11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
11642
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
11498
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
11261
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
10241
1/1/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
10160
1/1/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
9560
1/1/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
9373
1/2/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
9388
1/2/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
9128
1/2/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
9173
1/1/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
8575
1/2/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-lawyer Rating
(if applicable)
evaluator
ID
date
Rating
Litigant
29345
1/1/18
1
Other
21873
1/2/14
1
Litigant
19488
1/1/13
1
Other
12968
1/1/11
1
Other
12762
1/2/11
1
Other
11772
1/2/10
1
Other
8873
1/2/09
10
Other
6754
1/1/08
10
Other
6615
1/1/08
1
Other
4514
1/1/07
10
Other
4500
1/2/07
10
category average
-
Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible 10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)
Comments:
What others have said about
Hon. Marcia S. Krieger

Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
32647
rating:
7.4
Lousy. Temperamental.
1/1/19, 7:46 AM

Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
32652
rating:
10
A fine judge
1/1/19, 7:57 AM

Litigant
comment #:
29345
rating:
0
A disaster hiding under a robe. Does not understand the facts and makes up her own, shows no respect to either side...then fails to uphold the juries awards. Very sad, you will find no justice in her court
1/1/18, 4:54 PM

Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
27331
rating:
1.2
Every negative comment on this board is well deserved. She has absolutely no business on the bench. I went into her courtroom expecting fairness and was completely disappointed, her only concern is reminding you that she’s the smartest one in the room. She is ill tempered and abuses her power to create roadblocks for parties she does not like (usually plaintiffs).
1/2/18, 11:34 AM

Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
23390
rating:
1.5
Judge Krieger is a disgrace. She is arrogant, ill-tempered, condescending, and superficial. Despite her belief that she is the smartest one in the courtroom (a view that only she holds), she is a weak thinker and scholar. She is motivated by conservative, defendant bias and she takes forever to rule. The federal bench is poorer for her sitting on it.
1/1/16, 11:48 PM

Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
23391
rating:
1
Takes after Bush..sorry I voted for the moron. Converted me into democrat. Incompetent
1/1/16, 9:32 AM

Court Staff
comment #:
22021
rating:
1
awful
1/2/14, 1:30 AM

Other
comment #:
21873
rating:
0
This liberal activist judge ruled in favor of CO magazine limits because citizens don't NEED more rounds in their guns. Apparently the Bill of RIGHTS has turned into a 'Bill of Needs'. These rights are recognized by government; they are not privileges. The second amendment shall not be infringed!
1/2/14, 2:31 PM
