top of page
Hon. Henry Pitman
Magistrate judge
S.D.N.Y.
2nd Circuit
Average Rating:
7.3
 -
13
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

arrow&v

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Henry Pitman

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24966

1/2/17

9

10

10

10

10

10

0

0

0

0

10

0
0
0

9.8

read comment
Litigant

23856

1/2/16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

21620

1/1/14

10

9

10

0

10

10

0

10

0

0

10

0
0
0

9.8

read comment
Other

12779

1/2/11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10290

1/2/10

8

9

8

8

7

10

0

9

0

0

7

0
0
0

8.3

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

10218

1/2/10

2

0

0

0

10

1

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

4.3

read comment
Litigant

10234

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9520

1/2/09

10

10

0

0

10

0

10

0

3

3

0

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3202

1/2/06

7

7

6

10

8

10

0

9

0

0

0

0
0
0

8

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3123

1/2/06

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

10

0

10

0
0
0

10

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3059

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

3

0
0
0

2

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2263

1/1/06

2

2

2

0

0

2

0

1

0

0

3

0
0
0

2

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2107

1/1/06

8

7

10

10

10

10

0

10

0

0

5

0
0
0

9.2

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24966

1/2/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Litigant

23856

1/2/16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

21620

1/1/14

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Other

12779

1/2/11

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

10290

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

10218

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Litigant

10234

1/2/10

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

9520

1/2/09

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3202

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3123

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

3059

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2263

1/1/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

2107

1/1/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Henry Pitman

minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
24966
rating:
9.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This is an intelligent, somewhat passionate and even-handed Magistrate Judge. If I could have him preside over every case I have I would be truly pleased.
1/2/17, 12:48 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
23856
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This jurist demonstrates a clear, baseless bias in favor the the defense in a civil employment discrimination action, to the extent of actually attempting to take advantage of his perception of a pro se litigant's purported dearth of knowledge of the law by fallaciously depicting aspects of a routine legal agreement as allegedly 'impossible.' Started out fair and reasonably impartial, but was obviously wrongly swayed by the defense in ex parte communications with same Caused one to recall a line from John Clifford Mortimer's Rumpole character (regarding a British judge who was displaying such an unrelenting bias in favor of the prosecution that Rumpole mused, 'I was tempted to ask the old darling if he cared to go into the witness box and testify for the prosecution'). There are other criticisms which may be fairly launched against this jurist, but suffice it to say that he represented yet another bitter disappointment in the allegedly august legal system. (That quote that I am paraphrasing here concerning, 'They call them the halls of justice because the only place you get justice is in the halls' is highly applicable here as well.) Court support staff are often, in many instances, afflicted with a severe lack of integrity.
1/2/16, 9:26 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
21620
rating:
9.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Pitman spent over five hours trying to help my client reach a settlement. He patiently explained the situation to my client.
1/1/14, 6:46 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
12779
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
He's apparently swayed by external politics that have no place in the courthouse. He will be exposed.
1/2/11, 7:32 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
10290
rating:
8.3
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Very smart and pleasant magistrate. Legal rulings are detailed and well-reasoned. Helpful but not heavy-handed in settlement discussions. Takes the ethical rules for lawyers very seriously.
1/2/10, 8:11 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
10218
rating:
4.3
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/10, 9:20 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Litigant
comment #:
10234
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
In my civil matter Judge Pitman was on the side of the defendent. Future plaintiff's beware; don't let Judge Pitman handle your case.
1/2/10, 4:57 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
9520
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
I observed Judge Pitman's arraignment of several criminal defendants and I was very impressed with his even handedness and willingness to give the defendants a fair unbiased hearing. Even a twice convicted drug felony drug dealer, he seemed willing to grant bail to, as soon as the defendant gets 3 people to sign on the bond. He also corrected the prosecution by stating that; 'The defendant is allegedly in violation of immigration law, since he is contesting the charge.' He said the main issues related to granting bail are : flight risk and danger to the community. It didn't make a difference if the defendant is a criminal or not, that is not the purpose of the arraignment and bail hearing. He said if the person is not a flight or danger risk then he should be granted bail. What an excellent and fair judge who believes that a defendant is truly entitled to due process rights.
1/2/09, 9:01 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
3202
rating:
8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
He is very businesslike and really understands the civil process. The worst I can say about him is he makes odd faces while he is trying to decide an issue, as though he were in pain. But his instincts seem just right. I'd take him in any case.
1/2/06, 8:58 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
3123
rating:
10
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/06, 8:08 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
3059
rating:
2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Virtually useless in pushing settlement, after making the parties listen to a lot of blah blah blah. Gratuitously nasty in his rulings and seems to be biased against plaintiffs in civil matters.
1/2/06, 5:37 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
2263
rating:
2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
This judge is arrogant and mean spirited. He prides himself that he does not listen to arguments of counsel. The Civil Rules are something he adheres to only when convenient, in his opinion.
1/1/06, 11:40 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
2107
rating:
9.2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Fair, evenhanded, serious, doesn't kill you on scheduling or bury you with pretrial burdens. Low-key but very perceptive. A very good choice i for a civil trial.
1/1/06, 3:11 PM
Send email to poster
bottom of page