top of page
Hon. Kenneth L. Ryskamp
District judge
S.D.Fla.
11th Circuit
Average Rating:
4.7
 -
13
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Kenneth L. Ryskamp

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Civil Litigation - Private

23010

1/1/15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

22143

1/1/14

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

21270

1/2/13

0

10

10

10

0

8

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

9.5

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

20659

1/2/13

2

2

3

1

0

3

0

5

0

0

4

0
0
0

2.2

read comment
Prosecutor

8803

1/2/09

4

3

3

2

5

5

5

4

4

3

4

4
4
7

3.9

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5109

1/2/07

3

3

6

0

0

3

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

3.8

read comment
Other

4265

1/3/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

2007

1/2/06

2

1

1

1

1

1

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

1.2

read comment
Prosecutor

2018

1/2/06

1

2

4

0

0

0

1

0

2

7

0

3
3
3

2

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1827

1/2/06

9

9

7

9

8

8

10

10

5

5

0

5
3
5

8.6

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1563

1/1/06

8

8

6

8

5

0

8

9

6

5

0

5
4
4

7.2

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

1216

1/2/06

3

4

4

0

10

1

1

1

0

10

0

10
8
0

3.8

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Civil Litigation - Private

23010

1/1/15

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

22143

1/1/14

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

21270

1/2/13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

20659

1/2/13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Prosecutor

8803

1/2/09

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

5109

1/2/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Other

4265

1/3/07

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

2007

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Prosecutor

2018

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1827

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

1563

1/1/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Govt.

1216

1/2/06

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
Other

20854

1/1/13
1
read comment
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Kenneth L. Ryskamp

minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
23010
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Never have written an opinion about a judge, state or federal. Seems this judge has been at it too long, and should retire. Comes across as an angry old man who hates is job, and it's reflected in his rulings. Never have I been before a judge who so seems to have predetermined his rulings, with no open-mindedness or lack of bias. Certainly the worst federal judge I have been before.
1/1/15, 3:34 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
22143
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Judge Ryskamp defends the PSO on ADA ad other civil right's violations against a senior citizen who is totally disabled on a false domestic violence charge that was dropped by the State Attorney's Office because it would be impossible for the individual to commit any violence due to eleven joint replacements. The deputy was deaf, dumb and blind and needed a seeing eye dog. The judge seals all evidence to protect a rogue road deputy and a corrupt Sheriff Bradshaw who committed dozens of acts deliberate indifference that put the litigant in fear of his life. The judge does not know the federal and state law regarding transporting and handcuffing of disabled individuals as well as the Sherif and the Defense attorney. The PBSO does not know these regulations and says these officers don't need training. He is like a deer caught in the headlights when it comes to understanding a case that involves an individual with auto immune disease. He plagarizes his Orders from Defense Counsel 's false statements and condones female strip searches of males and perjury by PBSO officers and admits evidence after the Discovery date. This judge is not qualified to adjudicate any case that involves an individual who is totally disabled with auto immune diseases. Corruption, coverups an collusion are rampant in the 15th District.
1/1/14, 4:21 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
21270
rating:
9.5
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
He is a fantastic judge. I admire his scholarship, as well as his grasp and resolution of complex issues.
1/2/13, 3:39 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
20854
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
I believe in ageism; it has a place in the workplace and in the courtroom. Just as certain people, such as pilots, should not be allowed to work past a certain age, judges should not be allowed to work past a certain age. Why is this judge still on the bench? Can he even think rationally enough to make a decision that could become a ruling that people have to live with?
1/1/13, 10:00 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
20659
rating:
2.2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Not a thinker. Not very cerebral. Does not follow the law but rather tries to mold the law as he would want the law to be. Very allied with insurance industry & big business.
1/2/13, 11:33 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Prosecutor
comment #:
8803
rating:
3.9
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
It just may be time for this 77 yr old to call it quits. The 11th circuit has spent years trying to get this Judge to properly sentence the defendant and impose proper restitution. . .
1/2/09, 11:09 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
5109
rating:
3.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/07, 9:57 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Other
comment #:
4265
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
THE FOLLOWING REVIEW IS A STATEMENT OF OPINION: Judge Kenneth L Ryskamp is responsible for letting a criminal go free after the defendant, who is a who is a well known PILL MILL M.D. was responsible for the deaths and overdoses of a few of his 300 patients. this doctor who took an oath to first do no harm provided his 300 patients with RX's for 400 pills every month year after year ie;Methadone, Xanax, Roxicodne,Loricet,Aderal, Soma, etc etc. Questio: Is Judge Ryskamp & U S Attorney Rabinowitz just as guilty as the DR. FEELGOOD ??? Is our justice system corrupt ??? e-mail me your comments. palmbeach1912@aol.com
1/3/07, 1:05 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
2007
rating:
1.2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/06, 12:03 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Prosecutor
comment #:
2018
rating:
2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
influenced by who the lawyers are
1/2/06, 1:27 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
1827
rating:
8.6
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Your basic good judge
1/2/06, 7:53 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
1563
rating:
7.2
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/1/06, 12:34 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Govt.
comment #:
1216
rating:
3.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
1/2/06, 12:04 PM
Send email to poster
bottom of page