top of page
THE ROBING ROOM
where judges are judged
Hon. M. Faith Angell
Magistrate judge
E.D.Pa.
3rd Circuit
Average Rating:
0
-
2
rating(s)
rating submitted
Please send me alerts on this judge
subscribed
Ratings:
What others have rated
Hon. M. Faith Angell
evaluator
ID
date
Temp* Sch* Indu* Comp* Punct* Ev-Cv* Ev-Cr* Flex Bail Crim Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Litigant
3729
1/2/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly ProGovernment,10=Strongly ProDefense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly ProPlaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly ProEmployee,10=Strongly ProEmployer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly ProImmigrant,10=Strongly ProGov.)
evaluator
ID
date
Fam Par Qu-Arg At-Arg Sch Cri Civ Lab Imm
Litigant
3729
1/2/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-lawyer Rating
(if applicable)
evaluator
ID
date
Rating
Other
3928
1/1/07
1
category average
-
Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible 10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)
comments1
Comments:
What others have said about
Hon. M. Faith Angell
Other
comment #:
3928
rating:
0
How is it possible that Judge M Faith Angell Mase a ruling (of course giving Philadelphia the upper hand), when she already retired????????? I see the March Case decided in 2007. Here are all postings in regards to M Faith Angels retirement, maybe Im wrong, but it looks funny to me...and everyone else I have shown it to. Even though there was a recsll for her, she still attended a retirement dinner after the recall. http://www.jsd.cq.com/scripts/index.cfm Saturday, November 25, 2006 ? Judge Jane R. Roth, took Senior Status from the U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit The following Judges retired from the bench: U.S. Bankruptcy Judge James N. Barr, retired from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California U.S. Magistrate Judge Faith M. Angell, retired from the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. U.S. Magistrate Judge Peter A. Nowlinski, retired from U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California. U.S. Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport, retired from U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. U.S. Magistrate Judge O. Edward Schlatter,
1/1/07, 12:15 PM
Litigant
comment #:
3729
rating:
0
Faith Angel denied and Recomended the Denial of a Federal Habeas that had no warrant, bill of indictment(information) OR complaint. The Departnment of Justice even stated no such records existed. In effect, she presided over and DENIED a NON existent Federal Habeas, in effect propetuating the false imprisonmnet of five people. Re: Mail Fraud, extortion, non reporting of money to IRS?? involving Pennsylvania Judges involved in Fumo case I would like to report multiple instances of mail fraud and exchange of large sums of cash through the mail but am not sure which direction to turn. In the summer of 2006, I started a search for court records from the PA En Banc court to the Federal Eastern District Court of Pennsylvania. I requested Federal Habeas from Judge M Faith Angell (judge involved in Fumo case, dismissing his case in 2004, retiring then recalled and testified to FBI in regards to Fumo case in 2006). I paid two times for the records to Micheal Kunz – head of Clerk of Court, (friend of Fumo and on PA Historical Society together. Also Fumo is Chief of Clerk Courts). I received 2 letters via US Mail, telling me to come and pick up the records I had requested. I was given the run around and threatened. To this day, I have not gotten my money back, or the records THEY, Clerks at Federal Eastern District Court (Kunz), told me to come and get. The Habeas and other hearings to defend my brother cost tens of thousands of dollars. This case received NATIONAL media attention and was dubbed “The Trial of the Century.” The case also involved Judge Kate Ford Elliot, that sent an “opinion” stating it as fact that kept my brother in jail another 4 ½ years. In the meantime, we paid lawyers Norris Gellman over $30,000 dollars of my father’s government pension to continue in Eastern District Court. Also Judge Sandra Newman Shultz (recently stepped down), wrote orders in this case as a Prothonotary CLERK a non judge at the time. Based on FOIA Officer Chief, Criminal Crime Computer, Homeland Security Identity and Civil Rights Commission, there are NO records and the HABEAS never took place. No one in the courts know what I am talking about. The orders, Norris Gellmans information and the Habeas that Faith Angell illegally denied (habeas not denied for ANY reason as per Constitution), do not exist. Tens of thousands of dollars to defend a case that was not even real??? My brother already served an ENTIRE 5-10 year sentence for a first offense F2 aggravated assault and there are NO RECORDS of it. All money for the case was sent via US mail with copies of envelopes and checks with monies paid as recent as fall of 2006. I ALSO have $4,000 dollars sent through the mail via attorney Hobie Crystal for and expungement case that he ADMITS in writing, NO FILES EXISTED for. BUT, he took $4,000 dollars in regards to the case anyway via US Mail.. In a last letter to DOJ, investigators and US attorney’s office say DO NOT EXIST, NO RECORDS in EASTERN District Court. Is there something I can do to recoup the money from these non existent cases? There are also OTHERS involved in which monies total over $300,000.
1/2/07, 8:03 AM
HOME
bottom of page