top of page
Hon. Alison J. Nathan
District judge
S.D.N.Y.
2nd Circuit
Average Rating:
3.6
 -
5
rating(s)

rating submitted

Please send me alerts on this judge

REGISTER

subscribed

Add Comment and/or Rating

E-Mail Address (will not be displayed) 

Confirm E-mail Address

ZIP

Occupation

arrow&v

Comment:

Rating:

*Temperament:  
*Scholarship: 
*Industriousness: 
*Ability to Handle Complex Litigation:  
*Punctuality:  
*Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation:  
*Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation: 
Flexibility In Scheduling 
General Inclination Regarding Bail
General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Pre-Trial: 
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Trial:

General Incl. in Criminal Cases, Sentencing:

Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators:

  Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating

(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Not at all industrious,10=Highly industrious)
(1=Awful,10=Excellent)
(1=Chronic`y Late,10=Always on Time)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Demonstrates Bias,10=Entirely Evenhanded)
(1=Completely Inflexible,10=Very Flexible)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)
(1=Least Involved,10=Most Involved)

(1=Pro-Defense,10=Pro-Government)

(1=Most Lenient,10=Most Harsh)

(1=10%,10=100%)

How familiar are you with the work of this judge?:
Participates in Oral Argument:
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument:
Attitude during oral argument:

Scholarship as reflected in Opinions:

General Inclination in Criminal Appeals:

General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals:

General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals:

General Inclination in Immigration Appeals:

(1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)

(1=Rarely,10=Always)

(1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)

(1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Cons. respectful)

(1=Poor,10=Outstanding)

(1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)

(1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)

(1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)

(1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)

Non-lawyer rating (if applicable)

(1= worst, 10=best)

Ratings:

What others have rated

Hon. Alison J. Nathan

evaluator

ID

date
Temp*  Sch*  Indu* Comp*   Punct*    Ev-Cv*   Ev-Cr* Flex  Bail  Crim  Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Criminal Defense Lawyer

25447

1/1/18

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1
1
1

1

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24700

1/2/17

1

0

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

10

0

10
10
0

1

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

23471

1/2/16

2

4

2

3

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

2.8

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

23411

1/1/16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

20995

1/2/13

10

10

8

10

10

10

0

0

0

0

0

0
0
0

9.7

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-
-
-

-

Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Government,10=Strongly Pro­Defense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly Pro­Plaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Employee,10=Strongly Pro­Employer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly Pro­Immigrant,10=Strongly Pro­Gov.)
evaluator

ID

date
Fam     Par  Qu-Arg At-Arg    Sch      Cri       Civ   Lab Imm
Criminal Defense Lawyer

25447

1/1/18

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Criminal Defense Lawyer

24700

1/2/17

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

23471

1/2/16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

23411

1/1/16

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
Civil Litigation - Private

20995

1/2/13

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

read comment
category average

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Non-lawyer Rating 
(if applicable)

evaluator

ID

date
Rating
category average

-

Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)    
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)    
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)    
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)    
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible    10=Very Flexible)    
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)    
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)    
comments1
Comments:

What others have said about

Hon. Alison J. Nathan

minitalk.gif
​
comment #:
32928
rating:
​
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
​
2/13/22, 10:41 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
25447
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Just another pos that doesn't hold illegals accountable for being here illegally. Should get stripped of being in this position and thrown in jail.
1/1/18, 9:41 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
24700
rating:
1
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
judge nathan lacks confidence and compensates by being nasty to attorneys especially when they cite well-known cases for general priciples of law - one is left with the impression that because she is unfamiliar with the cases she becomes highly offended and lashes out in a demeaning and hostile manner - during a criminal trial she conducted herself like an animal when she snatched a document out of an attorney's hand in the presence of the jury then falsely denied that she did - she also treats caucasion lawyers better than she treats african american lawyers - she is by far one of the worst federal judges in the country
1/2/17, 10:52 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
23471
rating:
2.8
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
more arrogant than most federal judges. compensates for her toysl lsck of experience and maturity by condescending supercilious attitude. a good reason she was ranked unqualified by the ABA
1/2/16, 10:48 AM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
23411
rating:
0
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
Seems to just make a snap judgment about a case and stick with it. Unreflective and not particularly conscientious.
1/1/16, 3:42 PM
Send email to poster
minitalk.gif
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
20995
rating:
9.7
average rating is 3 out of 5
average rating is 3 out of 5
A brilliant and conscientious judge. She comes to hearings fully prepared. She listens closely, asks incisive questions, and knows how to discipline cases. She is an excellent, clear writer as well.
1/2/13, 4:05 AM
Send email to poster
bottom of page