top of page
THE ROBING ROOM
where judges are judged
Hon. Boyd N. Boland
Magistrate judge
D.Colo.
10th Circuit
Average Rating:
7.2
-
20
rating(s)
rating submitted
Please send me alerts on this judge
subscribed
Ratings:
What others have rated
Hon. Boyd N. Boland
evaluator
ID
date
Temp* Sch* Indu* Comp* Punct* Ev-Cv* Ev-Cr* Flex Bail Crim Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Other
23699
1/2/16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
20977
1/2/13
7
6
4
0
10
5
0
8
0
0
4
0
0
0
6.4
Civil Litigation - Private
19107
1/1/12
1
3
7
3
10
3
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
4.5
Civil Litigation - Private
18952
1/1/12
3
6
5
5
8
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5.2
Civil Litigation - Private
11722
1/2/10
2
4
3
3
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3.7
Civil Litigation - Private
9864
1/2/10
3
6
5
5
8
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4.8
Civil Litigation - Private
8857
1/1/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
7905
1/1/09
8
5
8
1
10
5
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.2
Civil Litigation - Private
7847
1/2/09
10
10
10
10
10
9
0
5
0
0
8
0
0
0
9.8
Civil Litigation - Private
6397
1/2/08
10
9
7
9
10
10
0
9
0
0
10
0
0
0
9.2
Civil Litigation - Private
4270
1/2/07
9
8
9
9
9
5
0
4
0
0
7
0
0
0
8.2
Civil Litigation - Private
4180
1/2/07
10
10
10
0
10
10
0
10
0
0
10
0
0
0
10
Criminal Defense Lawyer
1867
1/2/06
6
7
9
4
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6.7
Criminal Defense Lawyer
1880
1/2/06
9
7
9
7
8
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7.7
Criminal Defense Lawyer
1731
1/2/06
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
7
4
4
10
0
0
0
10
Civil Litigation - Private
1692
1/2/06
9
8
9
0
0
8
0
7
0
0
9
0
0
0
8.5
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly ProGovernment,10=Strongly ProDefense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly ProPlaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly ProEmployee,10=Strongly ProEmployer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly ProImmigrant,10=Strongly ProGov.)
evaluator
ID
date
Fam Par Qu-Arg At-Arg Sch Cri Civ Lab Imm
Other
23699
1/2/16
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
20977
1/2/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
19107
1/1/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
18952
1/1/12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
11722
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
9864
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
8857
1/1/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
7905
1/1/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
7847
1/2/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
6397
1/2/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
4270
1/2/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
4180
1/2/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
1867
1/2/06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
1880
1/2/06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
1731
1/2/06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
1692
1/2/06
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-lawyer Rating
(if applicable)
evaluator
ID
date
Rating
Other
25845
1/2/18
1
Other
25848
1/2/18
1
Litigant
25832
1/2/18
1
Litigant
5729
1/2/08
9
category average
-
Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible 10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)
comments1
Comments:
What others have said about
Hon. Boyd N. Boland
Other
comment #:
25845
rating:
0
Biased for defense
1/2/18, 2:20 PM
Other
comment #:
25848
rating:
0
If you have been victimized by a snake oil salesman don't let this judge anywhere near you arbitration case. On the other hand, if you are a crook and scumbag and liar you will love this judge.
1/2/18, 4:12 PM
Litigant
comment #:
25832
rating:
0
Do not let him arbitrate a construction case. He has no understanding of codes, architectural plans and showed evident partiality and exceeding his powers in a nonsensical decision where he actually, by his absurd statements, showed he changed a contract's wording and architectural plans. I think he has an obvious bias and showed some metal confusion. Avoid this poser if you are a plaintiff.
1/2/18, 3:28 PM
Other
comment #:
23699
rating:
0
Agree with other comments that he is totally biased against plaintiffs.He was so biased that he dismissed an entire case in reference to a school district abusing a handicapped child,when there were witnesses and clear and concise evidence of abuse!!
1/2/16, 3:25 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
20977
rating:
6.4
1/2/13, 1:11 AM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
19107
rating:
4.5
I've been in front of him his entire 20 plus year career as a district court magistrate. He was real open minded and helpful in the beginning of his career but now he's obviously burned out. I'd be surprised if he doesn't retire soon.
1/1/12, 3:46 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
18952
rating:
5.2
Extremely harsh on plaintiff's employment counsel. shows bias in favor of defense counsel--especially from large firms. permits egregious discovery violations by defense counsel, and imposes extremely punitive sanctions on plaintiff's counsel where defense counsel stonewalls.
1/1/12, 11:47 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
11722
rating:
3.7
This Magistrate is openly biased against Plaintiff's in insurance cases. An investigation should be conducted into the Magistrate permitting his clerks to write opinions; not surprisingly, his clerks get prize jobs at insurance defense firms.
1/2/10, 6:32 AM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
9864
rating:
4.8
The Magistrate needs to improve his prejudicial treatmentin favor of insurance defense. In the case of Garcia v Berkshire Life Insurance, docket confirms that the Magistrate overstepped his authority to hear a dispositive motion, in his court, without consent of the parties. The docket further confirms that the Magistrate allowed defense to reschedule a settlement conference to the day before the dispositive motions hearing. During settlement the Magistrate failed to maintain an evidentiary record, as the rules require. Worse, during the settlement hearing, Magistrate proceeded to pressure the disabled plaintiff into a shamefully inadequate settlement. (See affidavit of lawyer, Jeffrey Nobel in support of Motion to Recuse. It's likely the defense prejudiced the Magistrate with manipulation; however, the appearance of bias in strong.
1/2/10, 10:01 AM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
8857
rating:
0
As in-house counsel for an insurance company, I see a lot of highly biased judges. This is not one. He is courteous, fair, intelligent, and works to make the parties settle because they understand the risks, rather than because they've been bullied by the judge.
1/1/09, 10:55 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
7905
rating:
6.2
Clearly an intelligent and organized person. However, he seems to confuse punctuality and decisiveness with sound case management. As a result, his rulings on procedural matters in a complex construction case have been novel and simplistic and have cost the parties tens of thousands of dollars in unnecessary legal expense.
1/1/09, 3:45 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
7847
rating:
9.8
Smart, diligent, practical: you could not do better. Extremely well prepared so you better not speak without thinking ahead. Yes, too lenient with discovery abusers, but he probably sees that as evenhandedness.
1/2/09, 7:39 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
6397
rating:
9.2
Was excellent in mediation. Worked very hard to settle case. Was fair to both sides, and was creative in working with the parties to reach an agreeable settlement.
1/2/08, 10:07 AM