top of page
THE ROBING ROOM
where judges are judged
Hon. Thomas P. Griesa
District judge
S.D.N.Y.
2nd Circuit
Average Rating:
3.9
-
35
rating(s)
rating submitted
Please send me alerts on this judge
subscribed
Ratings:
What others have rated
Hon. Thomas P. Griesa
evaluator
ID
date
Temp* Sch* Indu* Comp* Punct* Ev-Cv* Ev-Cr* Flex Bail Crim Settle Trial Sent Coop Average
Other
21852
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Govt.
21859
1/2/14
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Other
21860
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21865
1/2/14
9
6
7
10
8
10
10
8
8
9
9
7
9
9
8.6
Civil Litigation - Private
21866
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21869
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21870
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Govt.
21889
1/1/14
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
Prosecutor
21890
1/1/14
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
Litigant
21891
1/1/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21811
1/2/14
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
1
Other
21835
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21838
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
21386
1/2/13
1
3
2
1
5
1
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
1
2.2
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21390
1/1/14
2
2
2
2
2
2
2
3
3
1
2
2
1
2
2
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21208
1/1/13
3
2
2
2
0
3
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
2.4
Civil Litigation - Private
19403
1/2/13
10
7
9
8
10
10
0
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
Criminal Defense Lawyer
9860
1/2/10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
10
Criminal Defense Lawyer
8724
1/3/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
5040
1/1/07
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Items marked with (*) are averaged into the displayed overall rating
Fam
Par
Qu-Arg
At-Arg
Sch
Cri
Civ
Lab
Imm
How familiar are you with the work of this judge? (1=Not at all familiar,10=Extremely familiar)
Participates in Oral Argument (1=Rarely,10=Always)
Quality of Questions During Oral Argument (1=Poor,10=Extremely insightful)
Attitude during oral argument (1=Consistently inappropriate,10=Consistently respectful)
Scholarship as reflected in Opinions (1=Poor,10=Outstanding)
General Inclination in Criminal Appeals (1=Strongly ProGovernment,10=Strongly ProDefense)
General Inclination in Civil Rights Appeals (1=Strongly Pro-Defendant,10=Strongly ProPlaintiff)
General Inclination in Labor Law Appeals (1=Strongly ProEmployee,10=Strongly ProEmployer)
General Inclination in Immigration Appeals (1=Strongly ProImmigrant,10=Strongly ProGov.)
evaluator
ID
date
Fam Par Qu-Arg At-Arg Sch Cri Civ Lab Imm
Other
21852
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Govt.
21859
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21860
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21865
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
21866
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21869
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21870
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Govt.
21889
1/1/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Prosecutor
21890
1/1/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Litigant
21891
1/1/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21811
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21835
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
21838
1/2/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
21386
1/2/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21390
1/1/14
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
21208
1/1/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
19403
1/2/13
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
9860
1/2/10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Criminal Defense Lawyer
8724
1/3/09
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Civil Litigation - Private
5040
1/1/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
category average
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Non-lawyer Rating
(if applicable)
evaluator
ID
date
Rating
Other
22980
1/2/15
1
Other
22019
1/2/14
1
Other
21856
1/2/14
1
Other
21872
1/2/14
1
Other
21883
1/1/14
1
Other
21818
1/2/14
1
Other
21821
1/2/14
1
Other
21836
1/2/14
1
Other
21839
1/2/14
1
Other
21850
1/2/14
1
Other
6146
1/2/08
1
Other
4877
1/2/07
2
category average
-
Temp*
Sch*
Indu*
Comp*
Punct*
Ev-Cv*
Ev-Cr*
Flex
Bail
Crim
Settle
Trial
Sent
Coop
Temperament (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Scholarship (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Industriousness (1=Not at all industrious 10=Highly industrious)
Ability to Handle Complex Litigation (1=Awful 10=Excellent)
Punctuality (1=Chronically Late 10=Always on Time)
Evenhandedness in Civil Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Evenhandedness in Criminal Litigation (1=Demonstrates Bias 10=Entirely Evenhanded)
Flexibility in Scheduling (1=Completely Inflexible 10=Very Flexible)
General Inclination Regarding Bail (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Pre-Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Involvement in Civil Settlement Discussions (1=Least Involved 10=Most Involved)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Trial (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
General Inclination in Criminal Cases Sentencing (1=Pro-Defense 10=Pro-Government)
Typical Discount Off Guidelines for Cooperators (1=10% 10=100%)
comments1
Comments:
What others have said about
Hon. Thomas P. Griesa
Other
comment #:
22980
rating:
0
It is disgusting how he is treating Argentina. I was a bond holder and took the exchange deal 94% of the investors did. The 6% that held out should not be profiting because they were 'smarter' than the others using the courts system to get paid more.
1/2/15, 10:07 AM
Other
comment #:
22019
rating:
0
1/2/14, 6:42 AM
Other
comment #:
21852
rating:
0
Un Juez siempre tiene que juzgar conforme a derecho y la actitud patotera demostrada por su formación polÃtica lo hace completamente antijurÃdico rayano con lo amoral. Sinceramente le deseo la peor de las pesadillas. A su pesar, la américa latina, la verdadera AMÉRICA, sale a flote a pesar de las actitudes piratas.
1/2/14, 11:18 AM
Other
comment #:
21856
rating:
0
Mr. Judge, does not respect the human rights of Argentina and the sovereign rights of a Democratic Republic and Federal
1/2/14, 6:56 PM
Civil Litigation - Govt.
comment #:
21859
rating:
1
1/2/14, 11:19 AM
Other
comment #:
21860
rating:
0
Judge Thomas Griesa not consider countries as sovereign entities, but as businesses, subject to banckruptcy and seizure. The disfunctionality of the international financial system, expressed with special clarity in recent argentinean crisis (caused by a ruling from a single federal judge), only confirms the imperious necesity of a deep reform and democratization of credit institutions at a world scale.
1/2/14, 4:14 PM
Criminal Defense Lawyer
comment #:
21865
rating:
8.6
argentina should pay their debt
1/2/14, 4:07 PM
Civil Litigation - Private
comment #:
21866
rating:
0
Very very poor
1/2/14, 5:53 PM